Actor and BJP MP Kangana Ranaut is no stranger to controversy, and her upcoming film Emergency is no exception. The film, in which Ranaut portrays former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, has faced several hurdles since its trailer release. Now, the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has informed the Bombay High Court that Emergency can only be released in theaters if certain cuts are made.
The CBFC has recommended a total of 13 changes to the film, which include six insertions, four exclusions, and three modifications. This comes after Ranaut publicly stated that she would not cut any part of her film, vowing to release it as is.
The CBFC flagged the film for “scenes depicting political violence and unrest, along with mild references to atrocities against women.” As a result, the board determined the movie suitable for viewing by children under 12 only with parental guidance.
Key changes suggested by the CBFC include addressing concerns raised by Sikh groups regarding their community’s portrayal. The board recommended removing references to ‘Sant’ and ‘Bhindranwale’ from a dialogue between Sanjay Gandhi and Giani Zail Singh, deleting parts of a conversation between Indira Gandhi and the Indian Army, and cutting scenes that show Sikh militant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale being praised. Additionally, visuals and dialogues depicting the targeting of non-Sikhs, as well as any references to ‘Khalistan,’ are to be toned down or removed.
The CBFC also requested that a disclaimer be added, clarifying that the film is “inspired by true events” and is a “dramatic transformation.” It further asked the filmmakers to insert text indicating “real footage” where applicable and submit documentary proof for all statistics, statements, and references used in the film.
On the production side, co-producer Zee Entertainment Limited claimed that the CBFC had “illegally” and “arbitrarily” delayed the film’s certification. The production house is now considering whether to agree to the cuts.
The Bombay High Court criticized the CBFC for not taking a definitive stance on the certification, warning that indecision could potentially infringe on free speech and expression. The court urged the board to make a final decision regarding the film’s certification without further delay.