Ram Gopal Varma, the veteran director, has been the subject of widespread media speculation following a series of cases filed against him in Andhra Pradesh. The accusations stem from allegedly trolling posts on social media that were said to have offended certain politicians and celebrities. However, Varma has recently clarified the situation in a detailed statement, claiming he was never absconding and was, in fact, at his office, attending to his film commitments.
The director addressed the multiple cases filed against him, stating that the posts in question, which were allegedly posted over a year ago, were related to promoting a satirical film he had made. The cases, filed by individuals across different districts, have been rapidly accumulating, leading to suspicions of a coordinated effort to harass him. Despite the media’s portrayal of Varma being pursued by police teams, the director insists that law enforcement had never entered his office or even mentioned the word “arrest.”
Varma explained that he had requested more time to attend to his film work and had offered to appear for questioning via video conference, a proposal that was yet to be responded to. He raised concerns about a larger conspiracy involving political figures using the police force for personal vendettas, given the swift and unusual response from the authorities.
The director also defended his actions, emphasizing his right to freedom of expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. He likened the posts in question to political satire and memes, which are a common part of digital culture and should not be treated as defamatory or harmful. Varma criticized the media for sensationalizing the issue, turning it into a dramatic narrative, and clarified that he had not been absconding as reported.
In conclusion, Varma expressed frustration at the misinformation surrounding the case, reaffirming his respect for the law but also his commitment to defending his rights within the legal framework. He stated that he would continue to comply with legal procedures while challenging what he believes to be a politically motivated campaign against him.